Efficacy and Safety of Lianhua Qingwen for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / 中国结合医学杂志

BACKGROUND@#Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread around the world since its outbreak, and there is no ascertained effective drug up to now. Lianhua Qingwen (LHQW) has been widely used in China and overseas Chinese, which had some advantages in the treatment of COVID-19.@*OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LHQW for COVID-19 by conducting a systematic review with meta-analysis.@*METHODS@#A comprehensive literature search was conducted in 12 electronic databases from their establishment to October 30, 2021. Note Express 3.2.0 was used for screening of trials, and the data was independently extracted in duplicate by 2 researchers. The risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed by using the Cochrane collaboration tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively, followed by data analysis using RevMan 5.3. The RCTs or retrospective studies to treat COVID-19 using LHQW were included. The intervention measures in the experimental group were LHQW alone or combined with chemical drugs (LCWC), and that in the control group were chemical drugs (CDs). Outcome measures included computed tomography (CT) recovery rate, disappearance rates of primary (fever, cough, fatigue), respiratory, gastrointestinal and other symptoms, exacerbation rate and adverse reaction. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to whether LHQW was combined with CDs and the different treatment methods in the control group.@*RESULTS@#Nine trials with 1,152 participants with COVID-19 were included. The CT recovery rates of LHQW and LCWC were 1.36 and 1.32 times of CDs, respectively (P<0.05). Compared with CDs, LCWC remarkably increased the disappearance rates of fever, cough, fatigue, expectoration, shortness of breath, and muscle soreness (P<0.05). LHQW also obviously decreased the exacerbation rate, which was 0.45 times of CDs alone (P<0.05). There was no obvious difference between LCWC and CDs in adverse reaction (P>0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#LHQW was more suitable for treating COVID-19 patients with obvious expectoration, shortness of breath and muscle soreness. LHQW had advantages in treating COVID-19 with no obvious exacerbation. (PROSPERO No. CRD42021235937).

Estudio observacional para analizar las pautas de tratamiento de la disnea irruptiva en pacientes con cáncer en la práctica clínica / Observational study to analyze patterns of treatment of breakthrough dyspnea in cancer patients in clinical practice

INTRODUCCIÓN: Siendo la disnea irruptiva un síntoma muy frecuente en los pacientes oncológicos, no existen recomendaciones precisas para su tratamiento. El objetivo principal del estudio fue analizar qué tratamientos se utilizan en la práctica clínica diaria para el manejo de la disnea irruptiva en pacientes con cáncer en España. Los objetivos secundarios fueron describir las características de los pacientes oncológicos con disnea irruptiva y los atributos de esta alteración. MÉTODOS: Pacientes oncológicos mayores de 18 años, con disnea irruptiva y estado funcional Karnofsky mayor o igual a 30, atendidos en servicios de oncología. Se recogió el historial de tratamientos para la disnea irruptiva y las características de esta patología, variables antropométricas, índice de disnea de Mahler, escala de Borg, escala Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale, satisfacción del paciente con el tratamiento actual de la disnea irruptiva. RESULTADOS: La edad media de los 149 pacientes incluidos fue de 66 años (intervalo de confianza 95%: 64,3 a 67,9), siendo mujeres el 35,6% (53). La intensidad media de la disnea irruptiva fue de 5,85 (intervalo de confianza 95%: 5,48 a 6,22 Borg). El 55,1% de los tratamientos de primera opción fueron los opioides, seguidos del oxígeno (17,3%). El 79,9% de los pacientes (119) fueron tratados en monoterapia. En los casos que presentaban disnea basal se administró oxígeno en mayor proporción 21,1% versus 7,4% (p = 0,07). Si la disnea era predecible se administró en mayor proporción opioides, 70,9% versus 44,4% (p = 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: Los opioides constituyen el tratamiento de primera línea de la disnea irruptiva en la práctica clínica habitual; sin embargo, el grado de evidencia científica que justifique su uso es escasa. Se necesita más información procedente de ensayos clínicos controlados en los que se evalúe la eficacia comparativa de diferentes tratamientos.

INTRODUCTION: Although breakthrough dyspnea is very frequent in cancer patients, there are no precise recommendations for treating it. The main objective of this study was to analyze what treatments are used in clinical practice for the management of breakthrough dyspnea in cancer patients in Spain and the secondary objectives were to describe the characteristics of cancer patients with breakthrough dyspnea and the attributes of the disorder. METHODS: Cancer patients over 18 years of age, with breakthrough dyspnea and a Karnofsky performance score of ≥30, who were treated at departments of oncology in institutes across Spain were included in this cross-sectional observational study. The characteristics of breakthrough dyspnea, history of treatment, anthropometric variables, Mahler dyspnea index, Borg scale, Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale, and patient satisfaction with current breakthrough dyspnea treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 149 included patients was 66 years (95% confidence interval: 64.3 to 67.9), and 53 were females (35.6%). The mean breakthrough dyspnea intensity was 5.85 (95% confidence interval 5.48 to 6.22, Borg scale). A total of 55.1% of the first-choice treatments consisted of opioids, followed by oxygen (17.3%). A total of 119 patients (79.9%) received monotherapy for breakthrough dyspnea. Patients presenting with basal dyspnea received oxygen in a greater proportion of cases (21.1% vs 7.4%; p = 0.07). Patients with predictable dyspnea received a greater proportion of opioids (70.9% vs 44.4%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids constitute first-line therapy for breakthrough dyspnea in routine clinical practice, though the scientific evidence supporting their use is scarce. Further information derived from controlled clinical trials is needed regarding the comparative efficacy of the different treatments in order to justify their use.

Effects of indacaterol versus tiotropium on exercise tolerance in patients with moderate COPD: a pilot randomized crossover study / Efeitos do indacaterol versus tiotrópio na tolerância ao exercício em pacientes com DPOC moderada: estudo cruzado randomizado piloto

Abstract Objective: To compare a once-daily long-acting β2 agonist (indacaterol 150 µg) with a once-daily long-acting anticholinergic (tiotropium 5 µg) in terms of their effects on exercise endurance (limit of tolerance, Tlim) in patients with moderate COPD. Secondary endpoints were their effects on lung hyperinflation, exercise-related dyspnea, and daily-life dyspnea. Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, crossover pilot study involving 20 patients (mean age, 60.9 ± 10.0 years; mean FEV1, 69 ± 7% of predicted). Spirometric parameters, Transition Dyspnea Index scores, Tlim, and exertional dyspnea were compared after three weeks of each treatment (with a one-week washout period between treatments). Results: Nineteen patients completed the study (one having been excluded because of COPD exacerbation). Improvement in Tlim from baseline tended to be greater after treatment with tiotropium than after treatment with indacaterol (96 ± 163 s vs. 8 ± 82 s; p = 0.06). Tlim significantly improved from baseline after treatment with tiotropium (having increased from 396 ± 319 s to 493 ± 347 s; p = 0.010) but not after treatment with indacaterol (having increased from 393 ± 246 to 401 ± 254 s; p = 0.678). There were no differences between the two treatments regarding improvements in Borg dyspnea scores and lung hyperinflation at "isotime" and peak exercise. There were also no significant differences between treatments regarding Transition Dyspnea Index scores (1.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 2.3; p = 0.39). Conclusions: In patients with moderate COPD, tiotropium tends to improve Tlim in comparison with indacaterol. No significant differences were observed between the two treatments regarding their effects on lung hyperinflation, exercise-related dyspnea, and daily-life dyspnea. Future studies, including a larger number of patients, are required in order to confirm our findings and explore mechanistic explanations. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ...

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar um β2-agonista de longa duração administrado uma vez por dia (indacaterol 150 µg) a um anticolinérgico de longa duração administrado uma vez por dia (tiotrópio 5 µg) quanto a seus efeitos na resistência ao exercício (limite de tolerância, Tlim) em pacientes com DPOC moderada. Os desfechos secundários foram seus efeitos na hiperinsuflação pulmonar, na dispneia causada pelo exercício e na dispneia na vida diária. Métodos: Estudo piloto randomizado cruzado e simples cego com 20 pacientes (média de idade: 60,9 ± 10,0 anos; média do VEF1: 69 ± 7% do previsto). Parâmetros espirométricos, pontuação no Transition Dyspnea Index, Tlim e dispneia aos esforços foram comparados após três semanas de cada tratamento (com uma semana de intervalo entre os tratamentos). Resultados: Dezenove pacientes completaram o estudo - um foi excluído por causa de exacerbação da DPOC. A melhora no Tlim tendeu a ser maior com tiotrópio do que com indacaterol (96 ± 163 s vs. 8 ± 82 s; p = 0,06). Em comparação com os valores basais, o Tlim melhorou significativamente com tiotrópio (aumentando de 396 ± 319 s para 493 ± 347 s; p = 0,010), mas não com indacaterol (aumentando de 393 ± 246 para 401 ± 254 s; p = 0,678). Não houve diferença entre os tratamentos quanto à melhora na pontuação na escala de dispneia de Borg e na insuflação pulmonar no "isotempo" e no pico do exercício. Também não houve diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos quanto à pontuação no Transition Dyspnea Index (1,5 ± 2,1 vs. 0,9 ± 2,3; p = 0,39). Conclusões: Em pacientes com DPOC moderada, o tiotrópio tende a melhorar o Tlim em comparação com o indacaterol. Não houve diferenças significativas entre os tratamentos quanto a seus efeitos na insuflação pulmonar, na dispneia durante o exercício e na dispneia na vida diária. São necessários mais estudos, com um número maior de pacientes, para confirmar nossos achados e explorar explicações mecanicistas. (ClinicalTrials.gov ...

Effect of Indacaterol on Cough and Phlegm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Five Randomized Controlled Trials

We investigated the effects of indacaterol on cough and phlegm in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a meta-analysis with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of indacaterol in stable COPD patients. The symptom severity was defined using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). We analyzed patients treated with 150 microg (n = 945) and 300 microg (n = 832) out of 3,325 patients who completed the SGRQ from five RCTs. After a 12-week treatment of 150 microg indacaterol, cough improvement was reported in 36.5% (316/866) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 32.2% (259/804) patients treated with placebo (Relative Ratio [RR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.29). Phlegm improvement was reported in 31.0% (247/798) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 30.6% (225/736) of patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87-1.18). Dyspnea improvement was reported in 39.5% (324/820) of patients treated with indacaterol vs. 31.5% (237/753) patients treated with placebo (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = 0.001, I2 = 55.1%). Only dyspnea improvement was significant compared to placebo even at the 300 microg indacaterol dose. Compared to placebo, a 12-week treatment of the long-acting beta-agonist, indacaterol might not have a significant effect on cough or phlegm in stable COPD.

Efeito de curto prazo do tiotrópio nos portadores de DPOC em tratamento com B2-agonista / Short-term effect of tiotropium in COPD patients being treated with a B2 agonist

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto de curto prazo do uso de tiotrópio em pacientes com DPOC grave e muito grave com queixas de dispneia apesar do tratamento com outros broncodilatadores. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo incluindo pacientes com DPOC grave ou muito grave, com queixa de dispneia de pequenos esforços ou ao repouso. A cada 15 dias, o tratamento broncodilatador foi modificado: salmeterol, tiotrópio e associação salmeterol+tiotrópio. Ao final de cada regime, foram realizados testes de função pulmonar e teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6). Também foram avaliados o grau de dispneia e a capacidade de realização de atividades de vida diária. Para a avaliação das atividades de vida diária, foi utilizada a escala London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) validado para uso no Brasil. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 52 pacientes. Desses, 30 completaram o estudo. A introdução de tiotrópio como monoterapia resultou em uma melhora significativa (p < 0,05) da dispneia basal (média do escore da escala do Medical Research Council de 3,0 para 2,5) e ao final do TC6 (média do escore da escala de Borg de 6,1 para 4,5), e as diferenças foram significativas (p < 0,05 para ambos). O uso da associação salmeterol+tiotrópio resultou em um aumento significativo médio de 81 mL no VEF1 e na melhora de 5,7 pontos no escore da escala LCADL. CONCLUSÕES: A introdução de tiotrópio no tratamento de pacientes com DPOC grave a muito grave em uso de β2-agonistas de longa duração causa melhora na função pulmonar e alivio sintomático perceptível pelos pacientes a curto prazo. Esses resultados, obtidos em regime de atendimento de vida real, dão suporte ao uso da associação salmeterol+tiotrópio em protocolos de assistência específicos a esses pacientes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term impact of tiotropium in patients with severe or very severe COPD who complain of dyspnea despite being currently treated with other bronchodilators. METHODS: A prospective study including patients with severe or very severe COPD and complaining of dyspnea at rest or on minimal exertion. Every 15 days, the bronchodilator treatment regimen was altered, from salmeterol to tiotropium to salmeterol+tiotropium. At the end of each regimen, pulmonary function tests and the six-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed. The degree of dyspnea and the ability to perform activities of daily living were also assessed. To evaluate patient ability to perform activities of daily living, we employed the London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL), validated for use in Brazil. RESULTS: We evaluated 52 patients, 30 of whom completed the study. The use of tiotropium in isolation resulted in significant improvement in dyspnea at baseline (mean Medical Research Council scale score reduced from 3.0 to 2.5) and at the end of 6MWT (mean Borg scale score reduced from 6.1 to 4.5), and the differences were significant (p < 0.05 for both). The use of the salmeterol+tiotropium combination resulted in a significant (81 mL) increase in FEV1 and a 5.7 point improvement in the LCADL score. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tiotropium into the treatment of patients with severe or very severe COPD and using long-acting β2 agonists improves pulmonary function and provides symptomatic relief, as perceived by patients in the short term. These results, obtained under real life treatment conditions, support the use of the salmeterol+tiotropium combination in specific treatment protocols for these patients.

Molde brônquico devido ao uso de interferon peguilado e ribavirina / Bronchial casts attributed to the use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin

Relatamos o caso de um homem de 50 anos com uma rara associação entre moldes brônquicos e o uso de interferon peguilado e ribavirina. O paciente procurou o serviço de pneumologia por apresentar, há quatro meses, dispneia progressiva que evoluiu com tosse progressiva seguida da expulsão de moldes brônquicos frequentes e abundantes. O paciente foi tratado inicialmente com medicações broncodilatadoras e uso de corticoide oral e inalatório. Foram realizados fibrobroncoscopia, lavado broncoalveolar e análise do escarro, os quais não acrescentaram informações para elucidação diagnóstica. Durante o período sintomático, o paciente fez uso de interferon peguilado e ribavirina para o tratamento de hepatite C. Após 30 dias da interrupção das medicações, o paciente ficou assintomático. Este é o primeiro relato sobre a associação entre molde brônquico e o uso de interferon peguilado e ribavirina.

We report the case of a 50-year-old male patient with a rare profile: bronchial casts associated with the use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The patient sought treatment in a pulmonology clinic with a history of progressive dyspnea for four months that had evolved to progressive cough followed by frequent and abundant elimination of bronchial casts. The patient was initially treated with bronchodilators, as well as with oral and inhaled corticosteroids. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage and sputum analysis were carried out but did not contribute to the elucidation of the diagnosis. The symptoms developed while the patient was receiving pegylated interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C. The symptoms resolved 30 days after the discontinuation of the treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report of bronchial casts caused by the use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

Beneficios clínicos y funcionales de agregar teofilina a la terapia inhalatoria con broncodilatadores de acción corta en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica / Clinical and functional benefits of adding theophylline to a standard treatment with short acting bronchodilators in patients with COPD

Background: Although theophylline is considered a third line bronchodilator drug for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), it is widely used in Chile, because it is administered orally and has a moderate cost. Aim: To evaluate if theophylline adds clinical and/or functional benefits when associated to standard recommended inhaled bronchodilator therapy. Subjects and methods: Thirty-eight stable COPD patients who accepted to participate in the study approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution were studied. Using a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, theophylline (250 mg) or placebo was administered twice a day for 15 days in addition to inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide. Prior to and at the end of the study, patients underwent: a) a spirometry to evaluate changes in dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation using slow vital capacity (SVC) and inspiratory capacity (IC), b) the 6 min walking distance (6 MWD); and c) measurement of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures. Dyspnea and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated using appropriate questionnaires. Results: Compared to placebo, patients on theophylline showed significant increases in SVC (p=0.014), IC (p=0.002), and 6 MWD (p=0.005). They also experienced an improvement in dyspnea (p=0.042) and QoL (p=0.011). All patients improved at least one of these parameters with 53% of the patients showing an improvement in 3 or more. Conclusions: Our results indicate that adding theophylline to standard treatment with inhaled bronchodilators provides additional benefits in stable COPD patients by reducing dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation, improving exercise tolerance, dyspnea and QoL.

Improving antibiotic and bronchodilator prescription in children presenting with difficult breathing: experience from an urban hospital in India.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative frequency of other conditions that share a clinical overlap with pneumonia as defined by the WHO case management algorithm and to determine the possibility of refining the antibiotic and bronchodilator prescription on the basis of simple clinical features. DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Urban tertiary care center. METHODS: Two hundred children, between the ages of 6 months to 5 years, presenting with difficult breathing (as defined by WHO algorithm) were prospectively evaluated for the diagnosis and the need for bronchodilator and antibiotic therapy (clinician s diagnosis). An additional independent blinded evaluation of the chest X-rays was done by a radiologist after the study (radiologist-aided diagnosis). On the basis of reliable predictors (sensitivity > 70% and specificity > 70%) of antibiotic and bronchodilator prescription, irrespective of the exact diagnostic category, two viable modifications of WHO case management algorithm emerged, which were compared by paired proportion test. RESULTS: Acute asthma was the predominant condition (46% or 54%), pneumonia alone was rare (10%), co-existence of pneumonia with wheeze (bronchospasm) was more frequent (22% or 15%) and often diagnoses not related to the respiratory system were documented (18% or 17%). All the subjects in whom a preceding history of cough was not elicited had non-respiratory illnesses. An audible wheeze was appreciated in only 44 of the 150 cases (29.3%) with an auscultable wheeze. The two alternatives represented a significant (p < 0.0001) improvement over the WHO algorithm preventing inappropriate usage of both antibiotics and bronchodilators, primarily by restricting over-prescription of the former (14% and 26.5% for proposed algorithms 1 and 2, respectively) and under-utilization of the latter (40%). The performance of the alternative algorithms for the radiologist-aided diagnosis was marginally better for over-prescription of antibiotics (16.2% and 30.9% for proposed algorithms 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to amalgamate simple clinical features (history of: (i) previous similar episode of cough and difficult breathing, and (ii) fever) in the WHO case management algorithm to significantly refine the antibiotic (95% CI range 7% to 33%) and bronchodilator (35%; 95% CI 27% to 43%) prescription.

Ablación por radiofrecuencia de extrasistolía ventricular aislada sintomática en corazón sano / Radiofrequency catheter ablation in symptomatic premature ventricular depolarizations in patients without heart disease

Introduction: Premature ventricular depolarizations (PVDs) in patients without heart disease, are a frequent clinical problem that can cause important symptoms. Most commonly, this benign arrhythmia responds to treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. However, occasionally PVDs are refractory to pharmacological treatment but they can be eliminated with radiofrecuency catheter ablation. Aim: To show our experience with four patients in whom we used this method. Material and method: We studied three men and a woman, twelve to forty six years old. All of them were symptomatic, their EKG and echocardiogram were normal and they had been treated with several drugs without response. In three of them the PVDs had left bundle-branch block morphology with inferior axis; the other patient had right bundle-branch block morphology with superior axis. The origin of the PVDs was determined using pace mapping. Results: Two of the patients had spontaneous PVDs; in the other two isoproterenol infusion was used to induce them. In three patients the origin of the PVDs was located in right ventricular outflow and in the other in the anterolateral region of the left ventricle. None had sustained atrial or ventricular arrhythmia. In all of them PVDs were eliminated. A patient presented a second morphology that could not be treated. None of the patients had complications and they were discharged within the next 24 hours. Three noted symptomatic improvement and after 18 months, only one had a probable recurrence of the arrhythmia. Conclusions: radiofrecuency catheter ablation can be successfully used to eliminate PVDs in severely symptomatic and drug-resistant patients

Caracterización de los pacientes portadores de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y su respuesta a ipratropio y teofilina / Characterization of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and their response to ipratropium and theophylline

La respuesta clínica y funcional a dos broncodilatadores, bromuro de ipratropio y teofilina en enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica fue evaluada en 62 pacientes, procedentes del programa de enfermedades bronquiales obstructivas del Instituto Nacional del Tórax. Conjuntamente se describen las características clínicas, radiológicas y de laboratorio de los 62 pacientes. El estudio duró 6 meses y los pacientes recibieron bromuro de ipratropio 40 mg 4 veces al día por vía inhalatoria o teofilina oral 200 mg 2 veces al día. Por distribución aleatoria se dividieron en dos series : ipratropio (n=30) y teofilina (n=32) realizándose cambio de terapia a los 3 meses. Los pacientes fueron sometidos mensualmente a un seguimiento clínico y funcional durante el tiempo de duración del estudio. Al final del período de tratamiento, la disnea mejoró solo durante el período con ipratropio (p<0,01), aunque no se apreció cambios significativos en la función pulmonar con ninguno de los dos medicamentos. Durante el período con ipratropio se presentó una menor frecuencia de reacciones adversas severas (p < 0,05)

Tratamiento de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática con colchicina / Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with colchicine

Background: Experimental and clinical evidences suggest that colchicine can be effective in the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Aim: To assess the effect of colchicine in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Patients and methods: Patients with clinically diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were treated with colchicine in doses of 0.5 to 1 mg/day, according to tolerance and followed for periods ranging from 7 to 40 months. The clinical and radiological score reported by Watters et al was used for the longitudinal assessment of patients. Maintenance or improvement in forced vital capacity and maintenance or decrease in alveolar arterial O2 gradient during follow up, were considered as positive therapeutic responses. Results: Seventeen patients (10 male, aged 61 to 81 years old) were studied. Their basal score for dyspnea was 5.8 (over 20), for the chest X ray examination was 2.4 (over 3) and for CT scan was 2.8 (over 3). Basal FVC was 77 percent of predicted value (range 51-108 percent), basal FEV, was 82 percent (range 59-117 percent) and FEV1/FVC was 0.82 (range 0.68-0.95). PaO2 at rest was 78 mm Hg (ranges 63-97). Alveolar-arterial PO2 gradient was 16 mm Hg (range 5-31.6) at rest and 31 mm Hg (range 5.7-51.4) after exercise. Six patients (35 percent) had a positive response to therapy. Conclusions: The response rates of these patients to colchicine are at least similar to those obtained with steroids, but with less side effects

Etude rétrospective de 62 tracheotomies pratiquees dans le service O.R.L. de l'Hôpital Gabriel Touré, Bamako (Mali): de janvier 1986 à decembre 1992

A propos de 62 tracheotomies pratiquees en 7 ans a l'Hopital Gabriel Toure; l'auteur rapporte que c'est une intervention de survie faite le plus souvent chez le sujet adulte. La pathologie tumorale avec obstruction des voies aeriennes superieures reste l'indication majeure. Un cas d'emphyseme massif thoraco-abdominal ayant entraine la mort a ete observe. C'est une intervention de sauvetage dont la technique et la realisation doivent etre connues de tous les chirurgiens des pays en voie de developpement